Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6513 (GAU)

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF TAXES TINSUKIA v. M/S GAYATRI DISTILLERS AND BOTTLING INDUSTRIES AND ANR.

Review.Pet./72/2026 · 2026-05-10

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010018692026 2026:GAU-AS:6411 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Review.Pet./72/2026 ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF TAXES TINSUKIA G.N.B ROAD, TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIM-786125 VERSUS M/S GAYATRI DISTILLERS AND BOTTLING INDUSTRIES AND ANR. A PROPERTIORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT LAIPULI, P/O. PANITOLA, TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN-786125 2:COMMISSIONER OF TAXES KAR BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. B. Choudhury, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : None appears. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 11.05.2026 Heard Mr. B. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Review Petitioner. 2. The present review application has sought review of the judgment and order dated 21.01.2025 passed in WP(C) Page No.# 2/2 No.6003/2024 and other analogous writ petitions. 3. This Court has perused the grounds on which the review has been sought for. 4. It is a trite principle of law that for the purpose of exercise of the review jurisdiction, either of the three conditions have to be satisfied i.e., (1) that there is an error apparent on the face of the record while passing the judgment and order; or (2) when materials comes to light which the review petitioner could not place at the time when the impugned judgment and order was passed in spite of due diligence and; or (3) for sufficient reasons. 5. The grounds on which the instant review application have been filed, in the opinion of this Court do not satisfy any of the three conditions for reviewing the judgment and order dated 21.01.2025 passed in WP(C) No.6003/2024 along with connected matters. 6. Under such circumstances, the instant review application stands rejected, without prejudice to the contentions so raised in the review applications in respect to other proceedings. JUDGE Comparing Assistant