- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16900 WP No. 35402 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 35402 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: MR. DORAISWAMY REDDY S/O.LATE.G.SUBRAMANYA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.25, CHINNAPPANAIDU LAYOUT, BEHIND DEVEGOWDA PETROL BUNK, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BANGALORD-560 042. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHARATH KUMAR SHETTY, ADVOCATE- ABSENT) AND: 1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER/ MANAGER CITY UNION BANK LTD, NO.24-B, GANDHINAGAR, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, KUMBAKONAM, TAMILNADU-612 001 2. MR.K.MOHAN, S/O.KARUPANNA GOUNDER, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.14, 2ND CROSS, CHOWDAIAH BLOCK, SIVAN CHETTY GARDENS, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 042 3. MR.S.J.MRS.VIJAYAKUMARI, W/O.DORAISWAMY REDDY Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16900 WP No. 35402 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.25, BEHIND DEVEGOWDA PETROL BUNK, CHINNAPA NAIDU LAYOUT, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560 042 4. MRS.TAMILARASI, W/O.K.MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.14, 2ND CROSS, CHOWDAIAH BLOCK, SIVAN CHETTY GARDENS, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 042 5. MR.K.KAVEEN KUMAR, S/O.K.MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.14, 2ND CROSS, CHOWDAIAH BLOCK, SIVAN CHETTY GARDENS, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 042 6. MR.K.SURYA, S/O.K.MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.14, 2ND CROSS, CHOWDAIAH BLOCK SIVAN CHETTY GARDENS, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 042 7. M/S.JALSA NO.25/7, DODDANEKUNDI, K.R.PURAM, BANGALORE-560 037 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS REG. UNDER INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT 8. MRS.JYOTHI, W/O.GANDADHARA REDDY, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16900 WP No. 35402 of 2025 MAJOR BY AGE, NO.6, GANAJOTHI NILAYAM, MALLIGE THOTTA, CHOLURPALYA, BANGALORE-560 026 9. MRS.RUPA, D/O.GANGADHARA REDDY, MAJOR BY AGE, NO.6, GANGAJOTHI NILAYAM, MALLIGE THOTTA, CHOLARAPALYA, BANGALORE-560 026 10. MRS.KAVITHA, MAJOR BY AGE, D/O.GANGADHARA REDDY, NO.6, GANGAJOTHI NILAYAM, MALLIGE THOTTA, CHOLURPALYA, BANGALORE-560 026 11. MR.DILIP REDDY, D/O.GANGADHARA REDDY, MAJOR BY AGE, NO.6, GANGAJOTHI NILAYAM, MALLIGE THOTTA, CHOLURPALYA, BANGALORE-560 026 12. M/S SEVEN HELLS ENTERPRISES, NO. 257, DODDANAKUDI VILLAGE, BANGALORE- 560 037 13. LOKESHWARA REDDY, S/O GANGADHARA REDDY, NO. 6, GANGAJOTHI NILAYAM, MALLIGE THOTTA, CHOLURPALYA, BANGALORE-560 026 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VINAYSWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED SALE NOTICE DATED 07.11.2025 BEARING NO. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16900 WP No. 35402 of 2025 CO/REX/NPA/2025-26, ISSUED BY THE R1 AS PER ANNEXURE- E. IN SO FAR AS PER PETITIONER IS CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer: "Wherefore it is respectfully prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased a) To issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari and quash the impugned Sale Notice dated 07.11.2025 bearing No.C.O/REC/NPA/2025-26 issued by the 1st respondent as per Annexure "E" insofar as petitioner is concerned. b) To direct the competent authority/department to conduct the enquiry over the fraudulent transaction over the loan account. c) Be pleased to referred the entire petitioner's loan statement of account to approved Chartered Accounted for proper inquiry. d) To direct the respondent No.1 not to disturb the petitioner's peaceful possession. e) To direct the respondent No.1 to release the documents of item No.1 and 2 infavour of petitioner. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16900 WP No. 35402 of 2025 f) To issue such other writ, direction or order as this Hon'ble Court deem proper in the circumstances of the case. g) to award to the petitioner, the costs of this petition." 2. Sri. C Vinay Swamy, learned counsel submits that he has instruction to file vakalat on behalf of respondent No.1. It is submitted that the entire loan amount is paid through OTS. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. 3. Considering the fact that already under OTS, the account is closed, nothing survives for consideration. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. All pending I.As., in the writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9