Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6506 (AP)

Meruva Pandu Rangaiah, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/47455/2018 · 2026-07-21

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010982702018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 47455/2018 Between: 1. MERUVA PANDU RANGAIAH,, S/O UMA MAHESHWARAIAH, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O SHAKHARAJUPALLE VILLAGE, SIDHAVATM MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. MERUVA SAVITHRI,, W/O. RAMA KRISHNAIAH, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O. SHAKHARAJUPALLE (V) SIDDAVATAM (M) YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. MERUVA PRABHAVATHAMMA,, W/O. UMA MAHESHWARAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O.UPPARAPALLE, H/O SHAKHARAJUPALLE (V) SIDDAVATAM (M) KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. BALARADH KRISHANAVENAMMA,, W/O. KRISHNA DAS, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O. SHAKHARAJUPALLE (V) SIDDAVATAM (M) YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. SANISETTY USHA,, W/O. VIJAYA KUMAR, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O. SHAKHARAJUPALLE (V) SIDDAVATAM (M) YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. MERUVA KRISHNAVENI,, W/O. VENKATA RANGAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. SHAKHARAJUPALLE (V) SIDDAVATAM (M) YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 2 VS,J W.P.No.47455 of 2018 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COLLECTOR, KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, SIDHAVATAM MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, SIDHAVATAM, KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue an order, direction or a Writ, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No. 4, herein, in refusing to receive, process, and register the sale deed/deeds for the agricultural land, admeasuring Ac.1-50 cts, in Sy. No.423/2, with Patta No. 435, belonging to the petitioner No.1 Ac.l-60 cts, in Sy. No.427/2, with Patta No. 436, belonging to Petitioner No.2 Ac. 1-50 cts in Sy. No. 427/4, with Patta No. 439 belonging to the Petitioner No.3 Ac. 1-50- cts in Sy. No. 416/1 with Patta No.377, belonging to the Petitioner No.4 Ac. 1-20 cts in Sy. Nos. 416/2 and 422/8 belonging to the Petitioner No.5 and Ac.l-50 cts in Sy. No. 427/3, situated in Upparapalle, H/o Shakaharajupalle Village, Sidhavatam Mandal, of YSR Kadapa District, as arbitrary,unjust, unreasonable, and opposedto all canons of justice besides being violative of Fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19 and 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.4 to receive, register and release Sale Deed forthe agricultural land, admeasuring Ac.1-50 cts, in Sy. No.423/2, with Patta No. 435, belonging to the petitioner No.1; Ac.1-60 cts, in Sy. No.427/2, with Patta No. 436, belonging to Petitioner No.2; Ac. 1-50 cts in Sy. No. 427/4, with Patta No. 439 belonging to the Petitioner No.3; Ac. 1-50- cts in Sy. No. 416/1 with Patta No.377, belonging to the Petitioner No.4; Ac. 1-20 cts in Sy. Nos. 416/2 & 422/8 belonging to the Petitioner No.5; and Ac.1-50 cts in Sy. No. 427/3, 3 VS,J W.P.No.47455 of 2018 situated in Upparapalle, H/o. Shakaharajupalle Village, Sidhavatam Mandal, of YSR Kadapa District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M MADHAVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) The Court made the following: 4 VS,J W.P.No.47455 of 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following prayer: “…to issue an order, direction or a Writ, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No. 4, herein, in refusing to receive, process, and register the sale deed/deeds for the agricultural land, admeasuring Ac.1-50 cts, in Sy. No.423/2, with Patta No. 435, belonging to the petitioner No.1 Ac.l-60 cts, in Sy. No.427/2, with Patta No. 436, belonging to Petitioner No.2 Ac. 1-50 cts in Sy. No. 427/4, with Patta No. 439 belonging to the Petitioner No.3 Ac. 1-50- cts in Sy. No. 416/1 with Patta No.377, belonging to the Petitioner No.4 Ac. 1-20 cts in Sy. Nos. 416/2 and 422/8 belonging to the Petitioner No.5 and Ac.l-50 cts in Sy. No. 427/3, situated in Upparapalle, H/o Shakaharajupalle Village, Sidhavatam Mandal, of YSR Kadapa District, as arbitrary,unjust, unreasonable, and opposedto all canons of justice besides being violative of Fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19 and 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and pass…” 2. Heard learned learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 3. Aggrieved by the action of the 4th respondent in refusing to receive, process and register the sale deeds pertaining to the agricultural land admeasuring Acs.1.50 cents in Sy.No.423/2 with patta No.435 belonging to the 1st petitioner, Acs.1.60 cents in Sy.No.427/2 with patta No.436 belonging to the 2nd petitioner, Acs.1.50 cents in Sy.No.427/4 with patta No.439 5 VS,J W.P.No.47455 of 2018 belonging to the 3rd petitioner, Acs.1.50 cents in Sy.No.416/1 with patta No.377 belonging to the 4th petitioner, Acs.1.20 cents in Sy.Nos.416/2 and 422/8 belonging to the 5th petitioner and Acs.1.50 cents in Sy.No.427/3 situated in Upparapalle, hamlet of Shakaharajupalle village, Sidhavaram mandal, YSR Kadapa district, the present writ petition is filed. 4. During the course of arguments, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submitted that documents, if presented by the petitioners, will be received and dealt with in accordance with Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908 (for short „the Act‟). 5. In this regard, it is relevant to refer to Section 71 of the Act, which reads as follows: 71. Reasons for refusal to register to be recorded.-(1) Every Sub- Registrar refusing to register a document, except on the ground that the property to which it relates is not situated within his sub-district, shall make an order of refusal and record the reasons for such order in his Book No.2, and endorse the words “registration refused” on the document; and, on application made by any person executing or claiming under the document, shall, without payment and unnecessary delay, give him a copy of the reasons so recorded.” (2) No registering officer shall accept for registration a document so endorsed unless and until, under the provisions hereinafter contained, the document is directed to be registered. 6. In view of the submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, the 4th respondent/Sub-Registrar is 6 VS,J W.P.No.47455 of 2018 directed to receive and process the documents as and when presented by the petitioners for registration in accordance with the provisions of Section 71 of the Act. In case the instrument presented cannot be registered, the 4th respondent shall pass appropriate orders as required under Section 71 of the Registration Act, as it is appealable under Section 72 of the Registration Act. 7. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 22.07.2026 Gss