[2026:RJ-JP:9818] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2561/2026 1. Sandeep Saini S/o Shriram @ Shrilal Saini, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Khardi Ki Dhani, Tan Girdharpura, Police Station Gothda, District Jhunjhunu, Currently Tenant Of Bhadwasi Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sikar). 2. Lalit Kumar Saini Son Of Shri Mohanlal Saini, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 08, Near Ramdevra, Dhani Ganeshpura, Police Station Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Currently Tenant Of Balaji Nagar, Jaipur Road, Sikar (Raj).( At Present Confined In District Jail, Sikar) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shantanu Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 06/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 101/2024 registered at Police Station Gokulpura, District Sikar, for the offence(s) under Section 115(2), 110, 331(6), 351(2), 191(2), 191(3) and 190 BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have not been named in the FIR nor in the statements of the complainant recorded during investigation. Learned counsel also submits that recovery has been effected and they are not required for further investigation. Learned counsel also submits that the [2026:RJ-JP:9818] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2561/2026] petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they are in custody since 25.01.2026, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in custody and therefore, prays that the petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners hereinabove. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have not been named in the FIR nor in the statements of the complainant recorded during investigation; there is no criminal antecedent registered against the petitioners; petitioners are in custody since 25.01.2026 and trial will take its own time. Without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Sandeep Saini S/o Shriram @ Shrilal Saini & Lalit Kumar Saini Son Of Shri Mohanlal Saini are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:9818] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2561/2026] 6. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J HEENA/112