Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6502 (HP)

Prashant Kumar v. State of H.P

CWPOA/4922/2019 · 2026-01-02

Ranjan Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:800 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No. 4922 of 2019 Decided on: 02.01.2026 __________________________________________________________ Prashant Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioner: Dr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Dr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on Instructions states that petitioner does not intend to continue with the present proceedings, with liberty to avail appropriate remedy, in case, the same is tenable, on facts and law [Statement Taken on Record]. 2. Prayer being innocuous, is not opposed, by Learned Counsel for the Respondents, subject to all just exceptions-defences, available if any. 2026:HHC:800 - 2 - 3. Accordingly, in terms of the Statement of Learned Counsel for petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of, with liberty, as aforesaid. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 2nd January, 2026 [himani]