Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 65014 (MAD)

R.SUJATHA v. the District collector

WP/6976/2026 · 2026-02-25

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 6976 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 6976 of 2026 1. R.Sujatha Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector District collector office, Grand southern Trunk Road, Chengalpattu, Venbakkam, Tamil nadu-603 111 2.The Revenue Divisional officer V.O.C. Nagar, Chengalpattu, Ammanambakkam, Tamil nadu-603 001 3.The Tahsildar Vengadamangalam Panchayat office No.23, Vengadamangalam Road, Rathinamangalm, Kandigai Tamil nadu-600 048 Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondents to demark the land bearing survey No.93/398 in the name of the petitioner situated at Plot No.1 shree balaji nagar, Vengadamangalm village, Vandalur, District Chengalpattu as per the settlement deed no.7637 of 2025 and rectify wrong extent entries in the patta bearing No.12608 by considering the petitioners representations which the 1st respondent received on 19.07.2025 2nd respondent receive don 21.07.2025 3rd respondent received on 30.07.2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Lohith For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For Respondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6976 of 2026 ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to rectify the alleged mistakes in patta bearing No.12608 for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. 2. The petitioner had given representations to the respondents along with supporting documents, seeking for rectification of patta bearing No.12608. Since the said representations have not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed. 3. Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. Since the earlier representations said to have been given by the petitioner do not contain the acknowledgement cards, the petitioner is directed to give a fresh representation. 5. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 6. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6976 of 2026 7. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the second respondent, seeking for rectification of the entries in patta bearing No.12608 for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the same, within the stipulated time, the second respondent, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, shall pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the said representation within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. 8. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 25-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District collector District collector office, Grand southern Trunk Road, Chengalpattu, Venbakkam, Tamil nadu-603 111 2.The Revenue Divisional officer V.O.C. Nagar, Chengalpattu, Ammanambakkam, Tamil nadu-603 001 3.The Tahsildar Vengadamangalam Panchayat office No.23, Vengadamangalam Road, Rathinamangalm, Kandigai Tamil nadu-600 048 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6976 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 6976 of 2026 25-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis