[2026:RJ-JP:13151] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 24/2026 Baksar W/o Aashik Khan, R/o Bileta, Rajgarh, Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Aasif S/o Nasru Khan, R/o Bileta, Police Station Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.) 3. Irfan S/o Kalu Khan, R/o Bijwad Naruka, Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. Mr. Nirbhay Tiwari HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 28/03/2026 1. The instant application for cancellation of bail has been filed under Section 483(3) of the BNSS in connection with FIR No. 1/2026 registered at Police Station Rajgarh (Alwar) District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 324(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submitted that without considering the nature of the injuries which were grievous in nature, as also opined as life threatening at a subsequent stage, the accused-applicant has been enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned counsel for the complainant appearing for Sahiman, submitted that while considering the cancellation bail, scope of the court to intervene is very minuscule. nonetheless, the instant matter is of cross-FIRs, as the complainant’s wife, who was physically and mentally abused called her maternal family for her [2026:RJ-JP:13151] (2 of 2) [CRLBC-24/2026] defense, due to which a family dispute occurred, and both the sides have received injuries in a fit of rage. It is also apprised that the place of incident was applicant's place. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, and considering the fact that though the nature of injuries was not specifically considered whilst passing the bail order, but at the same time, this Court is of a stern opin- ion that the concession of bail once granted ought not to be can- celed in a mechanical manner. Therefore, taking note of the un- dertaking and assurance given by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the accused/non-applicant, and the fact that the instant matter is of cross FIRs, this Court is inclined to dispose of the present application with a cautious direction that no interference, inducement or duress be caused to the applicant-complainant by the accused, directly or indirectly. 5. Accordingly, the instant bail cancellation application filed under Section 483(3) of the BNS, 2023 stands disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Shivam/Aman/11