Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6501 (GAU)

SAIDUL ISLAM v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/2330/2026 · 2026-05-20

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010085632026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2330/2026 SAIDUL ISLAM S/O ABDUL SAMAD, VILL. AND P.O. GUNIALURI, P.S. KALGACHIA, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM. PIN- 781319 VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, HAVING ITS CENTRAL OFFICE AT STATE BANK OF INDIA BHAVAN, MADAM CAMA ROAD, MUMBAI- 400021 2:ZONAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA ZONAL OFFICE BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781006 3:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER SURVEILLANCE AND INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT STATE BANK OF INDIA LOCAL HEAD OFFICE WEST GANDHI MAIDAN PATNA PIN- 800001 4:THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA KALGACHIA BRANCH DISTRICT- BARPETA ASSAM 5:THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA Page No.# 2/2 KALGACHIA BRANCH DISTRICT- BARPETA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N UDDIN, MR. R ISLAM,MR SAIFUL ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 21-05-2026 Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been mitigated and in such view of the matter, he has received instruction from the petitioner not to press this writ petition. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant