NETAJI SEBA SANGHA v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/1066/2025 · 2026-01-13
Raja Basu Chowdhury
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6501 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6501 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
13.01.2026 Ct. 3 Item No.
ML 82 sayandeep
WPA 1066 of 2025
Netaji Seba Sangha Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Kakali Dutta Mr. Sanjoy Chakraborty
…. For the petitioner
Mrs. Anushree Mandal Ms. Neelam Kumari
….. for the respondent No. 5 Mr. Souma Subhra Ray Mr. Arijit Roy Ms. Archana Baghel
….for the respondent Nos. 8.9.10 & 11
1. Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today is taken on record.
2. The petitioner is a club which is registered with the Registrar of firms, society and non trading corporation, West Bengal. The petitioner would contend that although, the petitioner had been using and/or utilizing a plot of land adjacent to the club premises, all on a sudden, the said area has been enclosed by constructing a boundary wall. Although, a representation has been made before the municipal authority, the municipal authorities have not taken any steps in that regard. While responding to the query from this Court, the learned advocate representing the petitioner, however, could not produce any document to establish that the
WPA 1066 of 2025
2
petitioner has any title in relation to the adjacent plot where the boundary wall has been constructed to enclose the same.
3. Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and noting from the learned advocate from the municipality that a civil suit is pending between the parties and also considering the fact that the petitioner has failed to disclose and document to support its prima facie claim over the adjacent land, I am of the view, there is no scope to entertain the writ petition.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed without any order as to costs.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)