Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6500 (ALL)

PAWAN @ HIMANSHU DUBEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLA/9201/2026 · 2026-09-13

Santosh Rai

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 9201 of 2026 Court No. - 93 HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed, today in Court, on behalf of opposite party no.4 is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant/applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no.4 and learned AGA for the State are present. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant/applicant comes up with the prayer to withdraw the present appeal on the ground that an application u/s 528 B.N.S.S. has already been filed by the appellant against the impugned order before the appropriate Court. 4. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 submits that he has no objection and admits the assertion made by learned counsel for the appellant. 5. Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Certified copy, if any, be returned as per rules. September 14, 2026 RA Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Adarsh Shukla, Siddharth Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Santosh Rai,J.) Pawan @ Himanshu Dubey .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAZIQ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad