Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 3.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.2800 of 2026 Sana @ Sanatan Nayak ..... Petitioner
Represented by Adv. - Srikanta Mahunta -versus- State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Party
Represented by Adv. – Mr. C.M. Singh, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
ORDER 23.04.2026
Order No.
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State. Perused the records. 3. This is an application under Section 438, Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioner for anticipatory bail, involving offence punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/25/29 of N.D.P.S. Act in T.R. Case No.25 of 2025 arising out of Gunupur P.S. Case No.30 of 2025 of the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Gunupur. 4. It is stated by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner was not present at the spot of occurrence and that he was implicated on the statement of co-accused. He also submitted that such statement of co-accused is not admissible in evidence and that the Petitioner does not have
Page 2 of 3. any criminal antecedent and that since the Petitioner belongs to the locality, there is no chance of his absconding. 5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State-Opposite Party, on the other hand, objected to the release of the Petitioner on bail on the ground that the investigation is still on. He further submitted that the cases of illegal transportation of contraband article are on rise in State of Odisha now-a-days. Therefore, no leniency should be shown to the accused persons who are involved in such type of offence. In such view of the matter, it is submitted that the prayer for bail of the Petitioner be rejected at this juncture. 6. Considering the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties, it is observed that the Petitioner, if so advised, may surrender before the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Special Judge, Gunupur, in the aforesaid case within four weeks from today. In the event the Petitioner surrenders and moves for bail within the aforesaid period, learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Gunupur, shall do well to dispose of the bail application of the Petitioner on the same day on merit in accordance with law keeping in view the fact that the Petitioner has been implicated on the basis of co- accused statement and does not have any criminal antecedent. Further, while considering the bail application of the Petitioner, learned Court in seisin over the matter shall apply the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Tofan Singh vs. State of Tamil Nadu reported in (2021) 4 SCC 1.
The case diary be made available to the concerned court to facilitate disposal of the bail application of the Petitioner. Release of the Petitioner shall be subject to the
Page 3 of 3. verification of criminal antecedent. In the event it is found that the Petitioner is having any criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to. 6. The ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly. 7. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra)
Judge Sisir
Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT