[2026:RJ-JP:12576] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12438/2025 Bakshu Alias Baksuram Alias Baksulal S/o Champalal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Kotdi, Police Station Ghatoli, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (At Present Accused Confined In District Jail, Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12885/2025 Bhojraj Meena S/o Ramsingh, R/o Village Thumda, Tehsil And Police Station Chippabarod, Dist. Baran (Raj.) (Petitioner Is In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sharma Ms. Drishti Mishra for Mr. Ali Mohammed Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 25/03/2026 In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12438/2025 Learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the present bail application. [2026:RJ-JP:12576] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12438/2025] Accordingly, the instant bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12885/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 135/2024 registered at Police Station Deoli Manjhi, District Kota, for the offence(s) under Sections 8/15 N.D.P.S. Act & 318(4), 336(2) of BNS and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 8/15 N.D.P.S. Act & 318(4), 336(2) of BNS dismissed the bail application before it. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant-accused submits that the applicant is behind bars for a period of two years approximately. Reliance in the regard of prolonged incarceration has placed upon the ratios spelled out by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Shambhulal Gurjar Vs. State of Rajasthan in Spl. Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).16671/2024 and Satyjeet Bhoi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh in Spl. CRL. No. 2401/2026. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the present bail application and has submitted that there are as many as three criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the overall facts and taking note of the fact that the applicant is behind bars for a prolonged period of approximately two years, relying upon the dicta encapsulated by [2026:RJ-JP:12576] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12438/2025] the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Shambhulal Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan (supra) and Satyjeet Bhoi v. State of Chhattisgarh (supra), and looking to the overall facts and circumstances, but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Bhojraj Meena S/o Ramsingh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J RINCHU /23-24