Ravindra Kumar @ Chotu Paswan v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./23606/2026 · 2026-04-15
Sandeep Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6496 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6496 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23606 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2026 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Ravindra Kumar @ Chotu Paswan Son of Devnandan Paswan Resident of Village - Ajwa, P.S. - Naubatpur, Dist. - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nazia Shabah, Advocate For the State : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 15-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 54 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of 160 packet of smack in small packets which indicates that the petitioner is a drug peddler.
4. The petitioner is in custody since 26.01.2026.
5. Considering the huge recovery and also the fact that the petitioner appears to be a drug peddler, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23606 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026 2/2 the present.
7. If the trial is delayed by the persecution, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.
8. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.
P. Kumar (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T