CRM-M-8597-20 IN THE H (266) MANIK DHIR STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. N Mr. B **** MANISHA BATR 1. The Section 482 of Bh for grant of pre- registered under S “BNS”) and Sec Industrial, Panipat 2. The a complaint submitt been induced by th and Priya Srivasta 2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH Versus HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Sahil Chaudhary, Advocate for th Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana Mr. Baljeet, complainant in person **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh -arrest bail in case arising out of nder Sections 318(4) of Bharatiya N d Section 24 of Immigration Act anipat. The aforementioned FIR was registe ubmitted by the complainant Baljeet d by the petitioner and the co-accused rivastava, who were running an imm JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-8597-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondents ANISHA BATRA e for the petitioner preferred by the petitioner under a Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) ut of FIR No.382 dated 02.07.2025 tiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short Act, 1983 at Police Station Old registered on the basis of a written aljeet alleging therein that he had ccused Gagandeep Kaur, Karan Dhir n immigration consultancy business M) 2026 oner s nder SS”) 2025 short Old ritten had Dhir iness AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.28 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-8597-20 under the name an on the premise of each other they g victims by repres However, neither returned thereby c 3. After initiated and are u application for g Learned Sessions J 4. It is a falsely implicated petitioner and the The terms of the petitioner. Copy o and Conciliation C investigation. His effected from him allowed. 5. Learn against the petitio benefit of anticipa person and is ide 2026 (O&M) 2 me and style of KD Immigration, to p e of sending his daughter and nephe they got a false and fabricated work representing that the work visa wou either any visa was issued nor mo reby causing wrongful loss to him and After registration of FIR, investiga d are underway. Apprehending his a for grant of anticipatory bail which w sions Judge, Panipat vide order dated 1 It is argued by learned counsel for t icated in this case. A compromise h nd the complainant before the Media of the settlement/agreement have bee Copy of the settlement/agreement as e ation Centre of this Court is part of re n. His custodial interrogation is not r m him. It is, therefore, argued tha Learned State counsel has argued tha petitioner and hence the petitioner do nticipatory bail. However, the comp is identified by the investigating of n, to part with a sum of Rs.23 lakhs nephew abroad. In connivance with d work agreement signed from the a would be issued in their favour. money of the complainant was and cheating him. vestigation proceedings have been his arrest, the petitioner moved an hich was dismissed by the Court of dated 19.01.2026. l for the petitioner that he has been mise has been effected between the diation and Conciliation Centre. ve been fully complied with by the nt as executed before the Mediation rt of record. He is ready to join the s not required. No recovery is to be ed that the petition deserves to be ed that there are serious allegations ner does not deserve to be extended complainant is present in Court in ing officer of the case who too is lakhs with the vour. was been d an rt of been n the ntre. the ation n the to be o be tions nded rt in o is AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.28 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-8597-20 present in the Cou the terms and co raised no objection 6. This C for the parties at co 7. The p the complainant b his nephew and between the partie and as stated by complied with by against the petiti considered opinio required. Even ot conviction sentenc ordered to be adm surrender before t 10 days from tod subsequently, as a surety bonds to th also not tamper w any witness acqua leave the country, 2026 (O&M) 3 e Court. The complainant has affirme nd conditions of settlement/agreeme jection to allowing of the petition. his Court has heard the rival submis es at considerable length. The petitioner alongwith the co-accu nant by inducing him to part with mo and daughter abroad. A compromi parties before the Mediation and Co ed by the complainant, the terms o ith by the petitioner. Given the nature petitioner and the above discussed opinion that the pre-trial incarcerat ven otherwise, pre-trial incarceration s entencing. Accordingly, the petition e admitted to bail subject to the con efore the Investigating Officer/Arresti m today and shall join investigation y, as and when required and subject to s to the satisfaction of the Investigat r with any evidence, will not pressu acquainted with the facts and circum untry, during investigation and trial of ffirmed the factum of compliance of reement by the petitioner and has ubmissions made by learned counsel accused is alleged to have cheated ith money on the premise of sending promise has already been effected nd Conciliation Centre of this Court rms of settlement have been fully ture of the allegations as levelled cussed facts, this Court is of the arceration of the petitioner is not ation should not be a replica of post- tition is allowed and the petitioner is e condition that the petitioner shall Arresting Officer within a period of igation within that period and also ject to furnishing personal as well as estigating/Arresting Officer. He will pressurize, induce, extend threats to circumstances of the case, will not trial of the case, except after seeking ce of has unsel eated ding ected ourt fully elled the not - er is shall of also ell as will ts to l not king AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.28 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-8597-20 permission from t No., Passport No Court and shall al Section 482(2) of 8. It is, be construed as an and shall not influ 9. Since any, is rendered in 27.04.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) 4 from the trial Court, shall disclose th rt No., cellphone No., while furnish hall also abide by all the terms and c (2) of BNSS. It is, however, clarified that the obse d as an expression of opinion of this C t influence the outcome of the trial in a Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes Whether reportable:- Yes/No lose the details of his Aadhar Card furnishing bond to the learned trial s and conditions as envisaged under e observations made above shall not this Court on the merits of the case ial in any manner. allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Card trial nder l not case n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.28 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.