- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10460 RPFC No. 2 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 2 OF 2018 BETWEEN: SRI. G. VENUGOPAL S/O GNANENDRA KUMAR, 30 YEARS, R/O BARANDAHALLI MANJAR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, KASBA HOBLI, TALUK & DISTRICT: KOLAR - 563 101. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. PREETHI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ANISH ACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. PUSHPA W/O VENUGOPAL Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10460 RPFC No. 2 of 2018 AGED 27 YEARS 2. KUMARI TANUSHKA D/O G. VENUGOPAL AGED 8 YEARS REP BY RESPONDENT NO.1 MOTHER OF MINOR GUARDIAN BOTH R/O BARANDAHALLI MANJAR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, KASBA HOBLI, TALUK & DISTRICT: KOLAR - 563 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. THARESHA K.N, ADVOCATE) THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19[4] OF FAMILY COURT ACT. AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.12.2017 PASSED IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS [FC] NO.80/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, KOLAR PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 FOR MAINTAINANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10460 RPFC No. 2 of 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER Heard Ms. Preethi who represents Sri. Anish Acharya, learned counsel on record for the petitioner. Also heard Sri. Tharesha K. N., learned counsel for respondents. 2. This revision petition is filed challenging the order that is rendered by the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Mysore in Criminal Miscellaneous case No.80/2015 dated 05.12.2017. When learned counsel for the respondents brought to the notice of this Court the order rendered by this Court in R.P.F.C.No.23/2018 dated 20.11.2020, contending that the order which is under challenge in this revision petition was challenged in the revision petition No.23/2018 and the same was disposed of allowing the said revision petition in part, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to dispose of this revision petition accordingly. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10460 RPFC No. 2 of 2018 3. No submission is made by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner had no knowledge about filing of R.P.F.C No.23/2018 and the order rendered in the said revision petition. Nothing is stated on the merits of this revision petition. Hence, basing on the submission that is made by learned counsel for the respondents, the revision petition is dismissed. Proceedings in interlocutory applications, if any pending, stands closed. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36