Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6484 (MAD)

AKSHAYA v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/8950/2026 · 2026-03-06

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 8950 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 8950 of 2026 Akshaya W/O.Aswath Murugan No.3A, C Block Cyprus Oaks Apartments Puliyakulam Road coimbatore-641 037 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Union Of India Through the secretary Ministry of Home Affairs North Block Central secretariat New Delhi-110 001 2. Ministry of External affairs(MEA) Government of of India Jawaharlal Nehru bhawan 23-D, Janpath New Delhi-110 011 3. The Consulate General of the Federal Republic of Germany NO.9, Boat club Road Raja annamalai Puram Chennai-600 028 4. VFS Global services pvt ltd 2nd floor, Ramee Mall 365, Anna salai Rostrevor Garden, Teynampet Chennai-600 018 ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8950 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to issue visa for petitioner minor daughter who is now under petitioner custody, in the pending Visa Application dated 21.1.2026 bearing visa application No.DEU/MAA/200126/0030/01 By establishing a diplomatic communication through appropriate channels with the 2nd respondent within time frame. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Karthik Varun For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Kulanthaivail for R1 and R2 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the third respondent to issue Visa for the petitioner’s minor daughter, who is now under the petitioner custody, in the pending Visa Application dated 21.1.2026 bearing visa application No.DEU/MAA/200126/0030/01b, by establishing a diplomatic communication through appropriate channels with the second respondent, within time frame, as fixed by this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsels appearing on either side. With the consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8950 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that due to non issuance of Visa to the petitioner’s daughter, the present petition has been preferred but however on filing of the petition, the Visa itself has been granted on 05.03.2026. 4. In view of the submissions of the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and since Visa has been granted to the petitioner’s daughter, nothing survives for further adjudication in the matter and hence, the Writ Petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 06-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No DP https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8950 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. Union Of India Through the secretary Ministry of Home Affairs North Block Central secretariat New Delhi-110 001 2. Ministry of External affairs(MEA) Government of of India Jawaharlal Nehru bhawan 23-D, Janpath New Delhi-110 011 3. The Consulate General of the Federal Republic of Germany NO.9, Boat club Road Raja annamalai Puram Chennai-600 028 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8950 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 M.DHANDAPANI, J. DP WP No. 8950 of 2026 06-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis