Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6482 (CHH)

NANDRAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1588/2026 · 2026-04-14

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17299 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1588 of 2026 1 - Nandram S/o Jagatram Patel Aged About 66 Years R/o Village- Mudpar Tehsil- Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2 - Pardeshi Patel S/o Chabli Patel Aged About 72 Years R/o Village- Mudpar Tehsil- Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3 - Jagbai W/o Kholbahra Aged About 46 Years R/o Village- Mudpar Tehsil- Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4 - Ram Kumar S/o Pardeshi Patel Aged About 34 Years R/o Village- Mudpar Tehsil- Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 5 - Sanjay Patel S/o Pardeshi Patel Aged About 32 Years R/o Village- Mudpar Tehsil- Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 6 - Omprakash S/o Nandram Patel Aged About 28 Years R/o Village- Mudpar Tehsil- Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 7 - Vinod Kumar Marar S/o Gorelal Patel Aged About 38 Years R/o Village- Mudpar Tehsil- Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 8 - Manki Bai Patel W/o Lakheshwar Patel Aged About 42 Years R/o Village- Mudpar Tehsil- Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 9 - Ashok Kumar Patel S/o Kedarnath Patel Aged About 41 Years R/o Village- Mudpar Tehsil- Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 10 - Roshan Patel S/o Late Kholbahra Aged About 27 Years R/o Village- Mudpar Tehsil- Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 11 - Dinesh Patel S/o Kedarnath Patel Aged About 37 Years R/o Village- Mudpar Tehsil- Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 12 - Dilesh S/o Kedarnath Patel Aged About 35 Years R/o Village- Mudpar Tehsil- Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.04.16 14:33:01 +0530 2 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited (Csidc) Through Its General Manager, 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan Ring Road-1, Telibandha Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4 - Sub-Divisional Officer (R) Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 5 - Tehsildar Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 6 - M/s Shri Shyam Ethanol And Spirits Private Limited Through Its Proprietor Ramesh Sultaniya Village- Banri District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Krishna Tandon, Advocate For Respondents 1, 3 to 5/State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Govt. Advocate and Dr. Arham Siddiqui, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Anumeh Shrivastava, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 15.4.2026 1. Heard. 2. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging order dated 13.3.2026 (Annexure-P/1) passed by Tahsildar, Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir Champa (CG) in Revenue Case No.202512060600014/A-68/2025-26, whereby the petitioners have been directed to vacate unauthorized occupation of Government land. The petitioners have also challenged eviction Notice dated 13.3.2026 passed by Tahsildar, Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG). 3. During the course of submission, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have challenged the aforesaid impugned orders before the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) by filing an appeal under Section 44(1) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959. Since the petitioners have already challenged the impugned orders before the Sub Divisional 3 Officer (Revenue), Akaltara, they cannot challenge the same orders before this Court. Hence, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition and the same is accordingly disposed of. 5. However, having considered the prayer of the petitioner, Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir Champa is directed to decide the interim application for stay filed by the petitioners as early as possible. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini