Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6480 (RAJ)

SURAJMAL S/O LAXMINARAYAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3848/2026 · 2026-04-06

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14115] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3848/2026 Surajmal S/o Laxminarayan, R/o Shivaji Colony, Gali No. 13, Kasba Niwai, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd Isaq Abbasi with Mr. Manish Mishra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/04/2026 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.368/2025 registered at Police Station-Newai, District-Tonk for the offences under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The FIR has been lodged with a delay of approximately 17 years. He further submits that in the present matter, the allegation against the petitioner pertains to an agreement dated 08.03.2008 under which the petitioner allegedly agreed to sell the plot mentioned therein to complainant and due to alleged non-performance of the agreement the petitioner has sold the above plot to another person dishonestly. [2026:RJ-JP:14115] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3848/2026] The contents of FIR itself indicates that the dispute is entirely civil in nature. He further submits that the negotiations are baseless and no custodial interrogation is required. Petitioner is willing to join and cooperate with the investigation. Hence, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the nature of allegations, the role of petitioner and fact that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case, without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the bail application of the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Surajmal S/o Laxminarayan, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to [2026:RJ-JP:14115] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3848/2026] the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/66