GOUNDAR @ RAVIKUMAR v. The State rep.by its, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/760/2026 · 2026-01-12
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 64793 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 64793 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 760 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 760 of 2026
1. Goundar @ Ravikumar S/o.Kasi, No.574, North street, Orangur village, Cuddalore district. Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State rep.by its, The Inspector of Police, Ramanathapuram Police Station, Cuddalore District. Cr.No.156 of 2014. Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in S.C.No.43 of 2020 on the file of Honble III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Virudhachalam, Cuddalore District. For Petitioner(s): M/s.K.Palaniappan For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate(Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 05.07.2025 for the offences punishable under sections 307 & 302 r/w.34 of IPC https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 760 of 2026 in Crime No.156 of 2014 in S.C.No.43 of 2020 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Virudhachalam, seeks bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner jumped bail in S.C.No.92 of 2015 for the offences under sections 307 and 302 of IPC and absconded for a long period. He was arrested only on 05.07.2025 and his case was also clubbed with another split-up case, S.C.No.43 of 2020, on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Virudhachalam. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was not aware of the pendency of the Non Bailable Warrant for a long period and and is ready to abide by any condition imposed by this court. Hence prayed for grant of bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner had earlier appeared before the Sessions Court in S.C.No.92 of 2015, then absconded and jumped bail on 17.08.2016. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner jumped bail in S.C.No.92 of 2015, which has now been clubbed with S.C.No.43 of 2020, and the petitioner was https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 760 of 2026 arrested only on 05.07.2025, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. 12-01-2026 Mpa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The State rep.by its, The Inspector of Police, Ramanathapuram Police Station, Cuddalore District. Cr.No.156 of 2014. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 760 of 2026 K.RAJASEKAR J. mpa CRL OP No. 760 of 2026
12-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis