Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6478 (GAU)

ARADHANA ROY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS

CRP/72/2024 · 2026-05-14

Kalyan Rai Surana

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010283562023 2026:GAU-AS:6755 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP/72/2024 ARADHANA ROY W/O ASHOK KUMAR ROY, VILL- NISKAR, P.S.-KATLICHERRA, DIST- HAILAKANDI (ASSAM) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, HAILAKANDI, DIST- HAILAKANDI (ASSAM), PIN-788151 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HAILAKANDI DIST- HAILAKANDI (ASSAM) PIN-788151 3:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL) KATLICHERRA P.O.-KATLICHERRA DIST- HAILAKANDI (ASSAM) PIN-788163 4:THE ASSISTANT SETTLEMENT OFFICER KATLICHERRA P.O.-KATLICHERRA DIST- HAILAKANDI (ASSAM) PIN-788163 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER KATLICHERRA P.O.-KATLICHERRA DIST- HAILAKANDI (ASSAM) PIN-788163 Page No.# 2/3 6:MUNNA PAUL S/O LATE BHANU CHANDRA PAUL VILL- RAMPUR P.S.-KATLICHERRA P.O.-KATLICHERRA DIST- HAILAKANDI (ASSAM) PIN-788161 7:NAKUL SUTRADHAR S/O LATE BAISNAB CHANDRA SUTRADHAR VILL- ALOICHERRA PART-IV P.S.-KATLICHERRA P.O.-KATLICHERRA DIST- HAILAKANDI (ASSAM) PIN-788161 8:BIKI PAUL S/O LATE PREMANANDA PAUL VILL- ALOICHERRA PART-IV P.S.-KATLICHERRA P.O.-KATLICHERRA DIST- HAILAKANDI (ASSAM) PIN-788161 9:TRIBHUBAN KANU S/O LATE NANDA PRASAD KANU VILL- NISKAR P.S.-KATLICHERRA P.O.-KATLICHERRA DIST- HAILAKANDI (ASSAM) PIN-78816 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. R CHOUDHURY, MR. A H M R CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 15.05.2026 Heard Mr. A.H.M.R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Page No.# 3/3 Mazumdar, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State, assisted by Ms. S. Nath, learned counsel. Upon instructions, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this revision with liberty to approach the appropriate jurisdiction. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the matter stands dismissed on JUDGE Comparing Assistant