Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6478 (ALL)

ANUJ KUMAR v. DR. AJAY SRIVASTAVA @ DEEPU AND ANOTHER

A227/12676/2026 · 2026-09-13

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12676 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Direct the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kanpur Nagar, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to hear and dispose of Complaint Case No. 438 of 2019 (Anuj Kumar Vs. Dr. Ajay Srivastava and Another) expeditiously and preferably within a fixed period of four months from today;" 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that Complaint Case No. 438 of 2019 has been preferred by petitioner before District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kanpur Nagar, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the Complaint Case No. 438 of 2019, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 14, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avneesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Anuj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Dr. Ajay Srivastava @ Deepu And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad