Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31596 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.3 out of 318) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Devendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Prabhat Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the informant, Sri Ram Mohit Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. This is the second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first one was rejected by this Court vide order dated 03.02.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.26541 of 2025. 4. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.0019 of 2025, under Section 103(1) B.N.S., Police Station Iradatnagar, District Agra with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that as a new ground, two witnesses have been examined subsequent to the earlier order and they have not supported the prosecution story. The applicant is in jail since 19.02.2025 and is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Per contra, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. have vehemently opposed the bail application on the ground that already three witnesses have been examined and the said statement that the witnesses are hostile is false; as such, the applicant is not entitled to bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Devendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Prabhat Kumar Tiwari
Keshav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that no new ground is there for pressing the second bail application, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected. 8. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. 9. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court be decided expeditiously, as early as possible, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
September 9, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 31596 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad