Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6475 (ALL)

RAJNESH @ ANURAG YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/9439/2026 · 2026-09-10

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9439 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. The Learned A.G.A. has pointed out that a charge sheet has already been filed against the applicant. He has raised an objection that the offences that have been alleged against the applicant, do not entail a punishment of more than seven years, in the event of a conviction. Therefore, there is no apprehension of arrest of the applicant. 2. On such an objection being raised, the Learned counsel for the applicant prays that the applicant may be permitted to appear before the concerned Court and apply for regular bail, which may be directed to be decided in accordance with the direction given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 and in the meantime their interest may be protected. 3. The Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the said prayer. 4. Taking into account the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that in case the applicant appears in Case Crime No.384 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 110 of the B.N.S., P.S. Patiyali, District Kasganj, before the Court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and applies for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of, expeditiously, in accordance with direction given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra) and the subsequent orders passed therein, without being influenced by any Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Yogesh Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajnesh @ Anurag Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) observations made by the concerned Sessions Judge while rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 5. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. September 11, 2026 Kushal NABAIL No. 9439 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad