Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6474 (AP)

MARADA TAVITI NAIDU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/33702/2022 · 2026-07-21

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010551302022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 33702/2022 Between: 1. MARADA TAVITI NAIDU, S/O DANAIAH @ DALINAIDU, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 39-8-28. MURALI NAGAR, SECTOR-II. VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, 2. MARADA SURYAKALA,, W/O TAVITI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 39-8-28, MURALI NAGAR, SECTOR-II, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. MARADA SAI KUMAR,, S/O TAVITI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RIO D. NO. 39-8-28, MURALI NAGAR, SECTOR-II, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. MARADA MANI KUMAR,, S/O TAVITI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 39-8-28, MURALI NAGAR, SECTOR-II, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THERLI KANNAMMA, W/O SIMHACHALAM, D/O MARADA DALINAIDU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS. R/O. D.NO.47-157, GOLLAPALLI MANDAL STREET. BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 6. THERLI SANKARA RAO., S/O SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.47-157, GOLLAPALLI MANDAL STREET. BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 7. KARRI TIRUPATHI RAO,, S/O. KARRI SANYASI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. SANO CHANDILI J K PUR, RAYAGADH DISTRICT, ODISSA STATE. 2 8. KARRI MEENAKSHI,, W/O.KARRI TIRUPATHI RAO, D/O. MARADA DALINAIDU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. SANO CHANDILI J K PUR, RAYAGADH DISTRICT, ODISSA STATE. 9. KARRI KRISHNA RAO,, S/O. KARRI SANYASI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RIO. D.NO.3-76, KURUKULA STREET, BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 10. KARRI SUDHEER,, S/O. KARRI KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-76, KURUKULA STREET, BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 11. PYDI ADI LAKSHMI,, W/O. LATE MURALI MOHAN. AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS. RIO. D.NO.3-75. KURUKULA STREET, BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 12. PYDI PRASANNA LAKSHMI,, W/O. BHOGI SRINIVASA RAO, D/O. LATE MURALI MOHAN. AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. RIO. KARADA, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE (STAMPS AND REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, V TOWN POLICE STATION, KANCHARAPALEM,VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM 3 DISTRICT. 7. KAMBAMPATI RAM MOHAN RAO, S/O. RAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OFFICE AT M/S. LAKSHMI TECHNOSOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., NASPUR HOUSE, HIMAYAT NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 8. M/S LAKSHMI TECHNOSOLUTIONS PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS KAMBAMPATI RAM MOHAN RAO, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT NASPUR HOUSE, HIMAYAT NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 9. ECE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT ECE HOUSE, 28-A, KASTURBA GANDHI MARG, NEW DELHI THE OWNER OF (APEEC) ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS OFFICER SRI, DEEPAK TIWARI S/O MADAN TIWARI, AGED 46 YEARS. 10. BHUKHAND DEVELOPERS LLP, REP BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MR. DL RATHI HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT 4, INDIAN EXCHANGE PLACE, 6TH FLOOR, KOLKATA, WEST BENGAL STATE. 11. M/S GALVEN TECHNOSOLUTIONS P LIMITED, REP BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. GADDE BABU RAO, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT DOOR NO. 3-123 ANJANEYAPURAM, CHIPURUPALLI, VIZAYANAGARAM DISTRICT. 12. M/S SREE BALAJEE NIRMAN AND ESTATES LLP, REP BY ITS DESIGNATED PARTNER MR. TADIKONDA BAPANAYYA GUPTA, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT DOOR NO. 50-81- 36/1, 1ST FLOOR, SREE BALAJEE CHAMBERS, GURUDWAR JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 to 6 in taking action against the 71h respondent for not effecting further registrations, in an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents in Sy No. 57/5, Ac. 1.70 cents in Sy No. 58/1, Ac. 3.52 cents in Sy No. 59/3, Ac. 4 1.35 cents in Sy No. 59/1, Ac. 0.64 cents in Sy No. 59/2 totaling an extent of Ac. 8-71 cents of Marripalem Village and also an extent of Ac. 1.35 cents in Sy No. 42/4, Ac. 4.22 cents in Sy No. 41 in Kaprada Village totaling an extent of Ac. 14-28 Cents and also in an extent of Ac. 3.45 cents in Sy No. 57, Ac. 01.70 Cents in Sy No. 58, Ac. 5.08 Cents in Sy No. 66, Ac. 0.80 Cents in Sy No. 68 of Marripalem Village and Ac. 4.11 Cents in Sy No. 42 of Kaprada Village totaling an extent of Ac. 15.01 Cents and to investigate into the fake documents created by the respondent Nos. 7 to 12, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 4 not to effect any further registration and respondents 3. 5 and 6 to register a crime against the respondent Nos. 7 to 12 and others and investigate into the same regarding fabrication of false documents and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 & 6 not to effect2 any further registrations by considering the representations dated 18-12-2019, 15-03-2020, made by the Petitioner's properties pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A CHANDRA SHAKER 2. GP FOR HOME 3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) The Court made the following: 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.33702 of 2022 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners has filed a letter, dated 10.07.2026 seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. No order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Date: 22.07.2026 chs Speaking ✔ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ✔ 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 52 WRIT PETITION No.33702 of 2022 Dated: 22.07.2026 chs