Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-19959
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 123
JITENDER KUMAR
STATE OF
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present:
SURYA PARTA
directions to respondents No.
2.
petitioner No.2. The decide the abovementioned representation within
3.
State is hereby dispensed with.
19959-2026 (O&M) 8587
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH
JITENDER KUMAR
VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA
Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sammi, Advocate
Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 respondents No.4 to 8. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the r has filed the representation (Annexure P The learned counsel prays for directions to decide the abovementioned representation within
Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana is hereby dispensed with. 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-19959-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 22.04.2026
.....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana. as been filed by the petitioner 1 to 3 to register the FIR against the sel representing the petitioner submits that the (Annexure P-2) before the respondent earned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 decide the abovementioned representation within the stipulated time. to respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana Hence service of notice upon the
(O&M) 2026
.....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS for against the sel representing the petitioner submits that the respondent 2 to upon the GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.22 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-19959
5. hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date (Annexure P Sonipat (respondent No. officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however clarified that merits of the contents of representation. liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner level. 6. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 19959-2026 (O&M) 8587
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioners (Annexure P-2) be disposed of either by the Commissioner of Police, (respondent No.2) or, on assignment by him, by any other police officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation.
liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of epresentation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own
In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioners ) be disposed of either by the Commissioner of Police, ) or, on assignment by him, by any other police officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of , and take an independent decision at his own In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of. :Yes/No : Yes/No
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioners ) be disposed of either by the Commissioner of Police, ) or, on assignment by him, by any other police officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of , and take an independent decision at his own GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.22 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document