ARSHAD AMIN v. UT OF J AND K TH INCHARGE POLICE STATION, ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, JAMMU
CRM(M)/133/2026 · 2026-04-15
Rajesh Sekhri
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 647 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 647 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 133/2026
Arshad Amin
….. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Nemo. q
vs
UT of J&K .…. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 15.04.2026
01. Learned arguing counsel for the petitioner after filing of the present petition on 27.12.2025 has not turned up. He is continuously absent which is sufficient to indicate that he has lost interest in prosecution of the petition.
02. In view of the above, present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution along with connected application(s).
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Jammu 15.04.2026 Sushant
Sr. No. 08