Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 647 (HP)

VINOD KUMAR v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/274/2026 · 2026-03-05

Ranjan Sharma, Vivek Singh Thakur

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh Cr.MP(M) No. 672 of 2026 05.03.2026 Present: Mr. K. S. Gill, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent/State. Cr. MP(M) No. 672 of 2026 For the reasons stated in the application, delay in refiling the proposed criminal appeal is condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of. Cr. MP(M) No. 274 of 2026 The applicant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo 20 years of imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for one year. He is serving his sentence in Model Central Jail, Nahan (H.P.). There is a delay of 65 days in filing the appeal against the conviction and sentence imposed upon the applicant. For the reasons stated in the application, the aforesaid delay in filing the appeal against the conviction and sentence imposed upon the applicant is condoned and the application stands disposed of. Cr. A. (C-DB) No. ______/2026 (ST No.502 of 2026) Be registered. Notice. Mr. Gautam Sood, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. Admit. Records be requisitioned. List for hearing in due course after completion. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 05th March, 2026 (Shamsh Tabrez)