[2026:RJ-JP:13206] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 472/2026 1. Komal Bairwa W/o Lokesh Meghwal, D/o Shri Soraj Bairwa, Aged About 20 Years, R/o- Ward No. 7 Gram Post Sankhana, Tonk (Rajasthan) At Present-Kalwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Lokesh Meghwal, S/o Shri Nandkishor, Aged About 22 Years, R/o- Kalwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Nodal Officer, Office Of DCP (West), Jaipur. 3. DCP (West), Jaipur. 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Sez, Jaipur (West) 5. Soraj S/o Shri Jamna Lal, R/o Ward No. 7 Gram Post Sankhana, Tonk (Rajasthan) (Father) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Mewara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent No.5 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent. [2026:RJ-JP:13206] (2 of 2) [CRLW-472/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Nagar Arya Samaj Sansthan, Bapu Nagar, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur on 20.02.2026 and same has been registered on 27.02.2026. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submit that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent No.5, who is father of petitioner No.1, is not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondent, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Sez, Jaipur (West) and respondent no.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /122