Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6468 (JHR)

GIRDHARI YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1522/2026 · 2026-04-10

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:10352 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1522 of 2026 ------ Girdhari Yadav, son of Kanthi Yadav, resident of Tumbael, P.O. Tibasdiha, P.S. Mohanpur, District Deoghar .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Awanish Shekhar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate ------ 02/10.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 272 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there is land dispute between the parties, which has also been indicated in the FIR itself. He further submits that the allegation of firing is against Anil Yadav and the only allegation against the petitioner is that he was present there. He also submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 9 of the petition. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner was present along with Anil Yadav. 5. Looking to the contents of the FIR, it transpires that there is land dispute between the parties and the allegation of firing is not against the petitioner, and the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 9 of the petition. In that view of the matter, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 15.04.2026