Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 64618 (MAD)

AMAR MOHAN KHALE v. STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

CRL OP/848/2026 · 2026-01-12

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP Nos. 848 & 852 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP Nos. 848 and 852 of 2026 1. Amar Mohan Khale S/o.Mohan, Konheri, Solapur, Maharastra State. Petitioner in both Crl.O.P.s Vs 1. State Rep.By, The Inspector Of Police Jolarpet Railway Police Station, Jolarpet, Tirupathur District. Cr.Nos.252/2016 and 251 of 2016 Respondent in both Crl.O.Ps. COMMON PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail pending S.C.NOs.73 of 2025 and 69 of 2025 on the file of the district and sessions judge thirupathur and thus render justice For Petitioner(s): G.Vinodhkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 01.08.2025, seeks bail in S.C.Nos.69 and 73 of 2025 for the offence punishable under sections 379 @ 120(b), 395 of IPC and section 174(C) of Indian Railways https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP Nos. 848 & 852 of 2026 Act in connection with Crime Nos.251 & 252 of 2016, registered on the file of the respondent. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an accused facing trial in S.C.no.69 & 73 of 2025 on the file of the learned District and Sessions judge, Tirupathur. He further submitted that due to ill health, he was unable to appear before the trial Court and trial Court issued the non- bailable warrant on 13.09.2024 and the same was executed on 01.08.2025. He further submit that since the trial was going on for very long period, he was not able to appear. He also submitted that the petitioner will undertake that hereafter he will regularly appear before the trial Court on all hearing dates and also stated that he is prepared to comply with any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner. 3.Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that due to the absence of the petitioner, the trial proceedings were stalled. He further submitted that, now the case is posted for framing of charges. 4.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 5.Considering the fact that the petitioner was involved in 7 previous cases and also absconded for more than one year, due to which the trial was stalled, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP Nos. 848 & 852 of 2026 this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. If the bail is granted, it will stall the trial process. Accordingly, these Criminal Original petitions are dismissed. 12-01-2026 Mpa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.State Rep.By, The Inspector Of Police Jolarpet Railway Police Station, Jolarpet, Tirupathur District. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP Nos. 848 & 852 of 2026 K.RAJASEKAR J. mpa CRL OP Nos. 848 & 852 of 2026 12-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis