Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6461 (KAR)

SMT UMA DEVI v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

WP/3489/2026 · 2026-02-12

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9139 WP No. 3489 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 3489 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. UMA DEVI W/O LATE V.N. KARINAGAPPA, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O VAJJANAKURKE, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 129. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.C.JAGADISH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AT MADHUGIRI MADHUIRI TAULK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 132. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 129. 3. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, KOLALA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK. TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 129. 4. SRI. HONNAPPA, S/O. GUDDANNA, AGE MAJOR Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9139 WP No. 3489 of 2026 5. SRI. RAMAKRISHNAIAH, S/O THIMMAIAH, AGED: MAJOR, 6. SRI. N.N.SANJEEVAAIAH, S/O NAGENDRAIAH AGE MAJOR, 7. SRI. MUDDARAJU, S/O. RANGADAMAIAH AGE MAJOR, 8. V.D. ARELINGARAJU S/O. DODDARANGAIAH AGE MAJOR, 9. SRI. RATHNAIAH V.R S/O RANGANATHAIAH AGED MAJOR, 10. SRI. V.N. NAGARAJU S/O NAGANNA AGE MAJOR, 11. SRI. MUTHURAJU S/O GANGAMUTHAIAH AGE MAJOR, 12. SRI. RAMANJANAIAH S/O HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGE MAJOR ALL ARE R/AT VAJJANAKURKE KOLALA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572129 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11.12.2025 BEARING NO.RP 22/2017 PASSED BY THE R1 PRODUCED AT ANNX-G AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9139 WP No. 3489 of 2026 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Notice to other respondents is not necessary for the following reasons. 2. Learned AGA raises a preliminary objection that the order under challenge is passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Madhugiri Sub-Division, under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short 'the Act' 1964) and revisional remedy is available for the petitioner under Section 136(3) of the Act, 1964. 3. Up holding the submission made by the learned AGA, writ petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Act, 1964. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9139 WP No. 3489 of 2026 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18