Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6454 (GAU)

MONJIL HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./1134/2026 · 2026-05-17

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010082952026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1134/2026 MONJIL HUSSAIN S/O ROFIUL HUSSAIN VILLAGE -KABAITARY, PART-III, P.S.- JOGIGHOPA, DISTRICT - BONGAIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N UDDIN, MR S K CHHETRY,MR. M ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date :18.05.2026 Heard Mr. N Uddin, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. By this application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, the petitioner, Monjil Hussain, who is facing trial in connection with Special (NDPS) Case No. 04/2026, pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge, Goalpara, has prayed for release on bail. Mr. Uddin has submitted that only 1 (one) witness has been examined in this case. Page No.# 2/2 I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for both the sides. Commercial quantity of narcotic drugs was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Considering entire aspect of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that let the Trial Court examine at least 4 (four) witnesses in this case and thereafter, the petitioner shall have the liberty to approach this Court again. With the above observation, the present bail application is disposed of. ….......... JUDGE Comparing Assistant