IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.18 of 2026 Date of Decision: 7.1.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Beli Ram ……...Petitioner Versus HPTDCL …....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Balbir Singh, Advocate vice Ms. Maheshwari Sharma, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made by the petitioner for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 2.7.2025, passed by this Court in CWP No.5445 of 2024, titled as Beli Ram v. HPTDCL and Ors., whereby afore petition came to be disposed of with a direction to competent authority to pay all the emoluments due to the petitioner within six weeks alongwith statutory interest as well as other interest from the date of filing of the petition. Since no action, whatsoever, 2 came to be taken at the behest of the respondent pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 2. Before reply, if any, could be called for from the respondent, Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, learned Senior Advocate, on instructions of the competent authority, states that revised gratuity and leave encashment shall be released during the course of the day. He states that so far as arrears are concerned, same shall be paid/released after disposal of the review petition filed by the Corporation in Tulsi Ram’s case. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondent to ensure that amount qua revised gratuity and leave encashment is credited in the bank account of the petitioner today itself, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment. Needless to say, amount, if any, due to the petitioner on account of arrears shall be governed by the decision by the competent court of law in the review petition filed in Tulsi Ram’s case. January 7, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge