DR. SARVABHOUMA SATAGOUD BAGALI v. SHRI. MANIVANNAN
CCC/1088/2025 · 2026-03-06
C M Poonacha
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6449 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6449 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13772-DB CCC No. 1088 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1088 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1.
DR. SARVABHOUMA SATAGOUD BAGALI S/O LATE SATAGOUD BAGALI AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS FORMER MLA R/AT NO.77, SRINAGARA COLONY SOLAPURA ROAD VIJAYAPURA - 586 101 VIJAYAPURA DISTRICT …COMPLAINANT (BY MS. KANAKA MAHA LAKSHMI D., ADVOCATE FOR SRI CHETHAN A.C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SHRI MANIVANNAN THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BENGALURU - 560 020 …ACCUSED (BY SRI SHASHANK GOWDA N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by VEERENDRA KUMAR K M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13772-DB CCC No. 1088 of 2025
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HONBLE COURT BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED HEREIN FOR HAVING WILLFULLY AND DELIBERATELY DISOBEYED THE ORDER/DIRECTION ISSUED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.04.2025 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.7356/2025, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 16.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7356/2025(BDA).
2. The said petition was disposed of with a direction to the BDA to consider the complainant's representations.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13772-DB CCC No. 1088 of 2025
3. The learned counsel for the accused has filed a memo indicating that the representations have been considered. However, the allotment has been cancelled.
4. The complaint is, accordingly, closed with liberty to the complainant to avail of such remedies as may be advised in respect to the decision of the accused and other concerned authorities, albeit in accordance with law.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17