Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 64478 (MAD)

Praveen Kumar. M v. State Rep.by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/641/2026 · 2026-01-09

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 641 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 641 of 2026 1. Praveen Kumar. M S/o.Madhu, No. 4-20, Achangkadu, Moolakadu, Mettur Taluk, Salem District 636 452. and another 2. Yesubalan@ Srihari.S S/o.Subramaniyam, No. 2/144, Kumaran Nagar, Hospital Colony, Mettur, Mettur Taluk, Salem Distirct 636 401. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State Rep.by The Inspector of Police Mettur Police Station, Salem District. Crime No. 548/2025. Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No. 548/2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): P.Dharani For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate(Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 641 of 2026 04.11.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 331(3), 331(4), 305(e) of BNS, 2023 altered to section 331(3), 331(4), 305(e) of BNS, 2023 r/w. Section 25(1)(B)(a) of the Indian Arms Act, 1959 in Crime No.548 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioners is that, the petitioners joining hands with other accused involved in house breaking and taken 90 numbers of bullets. Investigation was conducted and the petitioner was arrested and property was recovered. Hence this case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioners are in judicial custody since 04.11.2025; and that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the entire bullets (cartridges) were recovered after arresting the petitioners and though it is stated that the petitioners are not having any previous cases, they entered into Forest Office and damaged it and taken the properties and thus he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioners. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 641 of 2026 5. Considering the fact that the petitioners are not having any previous case and the property was recovered, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Salem, and on further conditions that:- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. [c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 641 of 2026 have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. 09-01-2026 Mpa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 641 of 2026 To 1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem. 1.State Rep.by The Inspector of Police Mettur Police Station, Salem District. Crime No. 548/2025. 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Salem. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 641 of 2026 K.RAJASEKAR J. mpa CRL OP No. 641 of 2026 09-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis