[2026:JHHC:11153] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1254 of 2026 ------ Nasim Uddin @ Guddu Khan, aged aobut – 42 years, son of Late Amin Uddin, Resident of Village- Near Purani Bus Stand Rajauli, P.O.- Rajauli, P.S. Rajauli, District- Nawada (Bihar) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. B.M. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Dilip Kr. Jaiswal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-05 Dated:-17-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No. 98 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed highway robbery and looted melted gold from the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted by drawing attention of this Court to the supplementary affidavit dated 08.04.2026 that in para-2, it has been mentioned that the petitioner has not been put under T.I. Parade but charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner, even though he is not named in the FIR. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.12.2025 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-14 of the bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, have already been admitted to bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.10.2025 passed in B.A. No. 9100 of 2025 with allied cases. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No. 98 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 17.04.2026 Saroj/