Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6442 (KAR)

SRI M R RENUKASWAMY v. SMT ANITHALAKSHMI K A S

CCC/1518/2025 · 2026-04-24

C M Poonacha

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22545-DB CCC No. 1518 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1518 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI M.R. RENUKASWAMY S/O LATE M.R. REVANNA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RETIRED REGIONAL MANAGER KARNATAKA STATE WARE HOUSING CORPORATION R/AT NO. 1669, 2ND CROSS, 2ND STAGE BALAMURIGANAPATHI TEMPLE STREET SRIRAMPURA MYSURU - 570 034 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI ANANDA H.J., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. ANITHALAKSHMI, K.A.S. MAJOR MANAGING DIRECTOR THE KARNATAKA STATE WARE HOUSING CORPORATION NO. 43, PRIME ROSE ROAD P.B.NO.2586 BENGALURU - 560 025 …ACCUSED (BY MS. URMILA PULLAT, ADVOCATE FOR SRI B.N. JAGADEESHA, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22545-DB CCC No. 1518 of 2025 THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT PRAYING TO INITIATE THE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDERS OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.30732/2024 (S-RES) DATED 10.09.2025 AND PUNISH HER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. None appears for the complainant. 2. The complainant had filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 10.09.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.30732/2024 (S-RES). The operative part of the said order reads as under: "7. In view of the above, the following order is passed: (i) The writ petition stands disposed of. (ii) The impugned order vide Annexure-A dated 13.08.2024 is quashed. (iii) The respondent is directed to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner at Annexure-P series, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, not later than three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22545-DB CCC No. 1518 of 2025 (iv) It is made clear that, if the law permits, the respondent is at liberty to initiate the departmental enquiry, in accordance with law." 3. The accused has filed an affidavit of compliance affirming that pursuant to the orders passed by the learned Single Judge, the complainant's representation was considered and an order dated 30.10.2025 was passed. It is stated that his retirement benefits have been released to the extent of `19,76,501/-. The learned counsel appearing for the accused states that a fresh departmental inquiry has also been initiated. 4. The complainant has sought to challenge the same in a separate proceedings. 5. In view of the compliance affidavit, the complaint is closed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE AHB, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12