Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 64390 (MAD)

A.LAKSHIME v. The Commissioner

WP/1339/2026 · 2026-02-05

P T Asha

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 1339 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA WP No. 1339 of 2026 A.Lakshime W/o.S.Aranganathan @ Arunkumar, Residing at No.13, N.S.K.Street, Manali, Chennai-600 019. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Building, Chennai-600 003. 2. The Zonal Officer Zone-2, The Greater Chennai Corporation, Manali, Chennai-600 068 ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to include https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1339 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 the petitioner Son namely A.Ragul in the Birth Certificate registration dated 01.08.2009 based on the petitioners representation dated 17.12.2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Senthil For Respondent(s): Mr.G.T.Subramanian, Standing Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- “directing the respondents to include the petitioner Son namely A.Ragul in the Birth Certificate registration dated 01.08.2009 based on the petitioners representation dated 17.12.2025.” 2. The Petitioner’s case is that her son’s name is A. Ragul, as evidenced by his Aadhaar Card and School Certificate. However, being uneducated and due to her ignorance, she did not mention her son’s name while applying for his Birth Certificate. Consequently, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 17.02.2025 to the 2nd Respondent, requesting the inclusion of her son’s name, A. Ragul, in the Birth Certificate originally registered on 01.08.2009. However, no action has been taken to date. Hence, the Writ Petition. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the respondents are ready to include the name of the child in the Birth Certificate. However, they are not willing to change the name of the father, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1339 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 which is originally recorded as “Arun Kumar,” though it is shown as “Aranganathan” in the Aadhaar Card and the School Certificate of the child. 4. In response, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would be suffice if the name of the child alone is included in the Birth Certificate. 5. Recording the above submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 05-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SHR To 1. The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Building, Chennai-600 003. 2. The Zonal Officer Zone-2, The Greater Chennai Corporation, Manali, Chennai-600 068 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1339 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 P.T.ASHA J. SHR WP No. 1339 of 2026 05-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis