DAMODAR TUDU v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ,POLICE HEAD QUARTERS,CUTTACK
CRLMP/395/2026 · 2026-04-29
Miss Savitri Ratho
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6438 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6438 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No. 395 of 2026
Damodar Tudu …. Petitioner
Mr. Anup Narayan Brahmachari, Advocate
-versus-
1. Director General of Police, Odisha. Police Head Quarters, Cuttack
2. Superintendent of Police, Balasore
3. Inspector In-Charge, Simulia Police Station
4. Gada Sahu @ Gadadhara Sahu
5. Manoranjan Behera @ Ramani
6. Ranjan Behera @ Teru
7. Sangram Behera @ Sangram Kesari Behera
8. Sukanta Nayak
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Saroj Kumar Rout, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
Order No. 29.04.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
05.
1. This CRLMP has been filed for issue of a direction for change in the Investigating Officer and for proper investigation in Simulia P.S. Case No. 42 of 2026 and to take steps to arrest the accused.
2. On 07.04.2026, as learned counsel for the Petitioner had made certain allegations against the I.O. as well as the investigation which were not stated in the CRLMP, he was permitted to file the same by way of an affidavit by 13.04.2026. When the matter was taken up on 15.04.2026 Mr. Anup Narayan p. 2 Brahmachari, learned counsel for the Petitioner prayed for an adjournment to file an affidavit as per the order dated
07.04.2026. Considering his prayer, the matter was adjourned to
27.04.2026.
3. No counsel had appeared on behalf of the Petitioner on 06.04.2026, for which the matter was adjourned to 07.04.2026. On 07.04.2026, the matter was adjourned to 15.04.2026. On 15.04.2026, learned counsel for the Petitioner had prayed for an adjournment in order to file the affidavit. On 27.04.2026, there was no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner, for which the matter was adjourned to today.
4. When the matter is taken up today, Mr. Anup Narayan Brahmachari, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has no instructions in the matter and files a memo to that effect. The same is taken on record.
5. No other counsel appears on behalf of the Partitioner.
6. In view of the memo, the CRLMP is dismissed for non- prosecution.
7. However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner for reviving the CRLMP within a period of three weeks from today.
8. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Sukanta Designation: Senior Stenographer