Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010312372013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 38152/2013 Between: 1. S.V.SATYANARAYANA,, S/O.APPA RAO, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.7-28-2, VYGRAM ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY , MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT HYDERABAD. 2. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF RAJAHMUNDRY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. G SURYANARAYANA, S/O.SATYANARAYNA, OCC: BUSINESS PROP:KALINGA BAR & RESTAURANT, VYGRAM ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ or order or direction -2- HN, J W.P.No.38152_2013 more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in trying to demolish the portion of building bearing D.No.7-28-2 situated at Vygram Road, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District in pursuance of the notice in U.C.No.09/2013/BO-VII, dt.16-12-2013 wherein the petitioner is running restaurant as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to stop all further proceedings including demolition of the portion of the building bearing D.No.7-28-2 situated at Vygram Road, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 47438 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings including demolition of portion of the building bearing D.No.7-28-2 situated at Vygram Road, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKAT CHALLA 2. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO 3. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV -3- HN, J W.P.No.38152_2013 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for any further consideration, as the subsequent orders have been passed by the respondent authorities, which would be challenged by the petitioner(s). 2. Recording the said submission, this Court is of the view that no adjudication on merits is required in this writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:20.07.2026 NKA -4- HN, J W.P.No.38152_2013 187 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 38152 of 2013 Date: 20.07.2026 NKA