Vairamani v. State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/6156/2026 · 2026-03-10
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6431 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6431 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 6156 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 6156 of 2026 Vairamani S/o. Selvaraj, Police Street, Mudaliarpet, CID PS., Puducherry. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, CBCID Police Station, Puducherry. Cr.No.28/2025. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail, who has been arrested in connection with the Cr.No.28/2025 dated 19.11.2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, CID Police Station, Puducherry. For Petitioner(s): B.Balavijayan For Respondent(s): Public Prosecutor - (PUDHUCHERRY) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.11.2025 for the alleged offences under Sections 318, 190 of BNS, 2023 @ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 6156 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 318(4) r/w. 3(5) of BNS Act and section 21(1), 21(2), 21(3) of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes (BUDS) Act, in Crime No.28 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was running a Chit fund company and misappropriated Rs.10 crores from 150 victims. Hence the complaint. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is aged about 58 years and that he has been in incarceration since 25.11.2025. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Public Prosecutor (Puducherry) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that total amount involved is Rs.10 crores and so for no amount has been recovered. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. Taking into consideration the gravity of the allegations and their impact on society, this Court is of the view that if the petitioner is enlarged on bail it may have a negative impact on society in respect of such type of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 6156 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 offences. Hence, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 10-03-2026 MPA To
1. The Inspector of Police, CBCID Police Station, Puducherry. Cr.No.28/2025. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 6156 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MPA CRL OP No. 6156 of 2026 10-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis