[2026:JHHC:10424] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.251 of 2026 ------ 1. Md. Gayasuddin, Age: about 70 years, S/O: Ulfat Hussain. 2. Rehana Parveen, Age: about 50 years, W/O: Md. Gayasuddin. Both R/O: Mirjagarib Street, Rajabandh, Raniganj, P.O:Raniganj, P.S: Raniganj, District: Paschim Bardhaman-713347, West Bengal 3. Mariya Kauser, Age: about 30 years, W/O: Mujahid Ansari, D/O: Md.Gayasuddin, R/O: Torai, P.O & P.S: Bopatpur, Pakur, Jharkhand 4. Neha Kaushar, Age: about 29 years, W/O: Nawed Alam, D/O: Md. Gayasuddin, R/O: South Bazar, Nazirbad, P.O: & P.S: Andal, Paschim Bardhaman, West Bengal. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Naziya Adiba, Age;24 years, W/O Mujammil Hussain, D/O: Md. Jawed Perwaiz, R/O: Dushadpada, P.O: Sahibganj, P.S.: Sahibganj (T), District: Sahibganj, Jharkhand … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Asif Khan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl. P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Rakesh Kumar III, Advocate ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-10-04-2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.2596 of 2025 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-prosecution on 09.09.2025 by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Cr.M.P. No.2596 of 2025 stood dismissed for non-prosecution on 09.09.2025 by this Court. It is next submitted that due to personal exigency of the learned counsel for the petitioners, no one appeared before this Court when the said Cr.M.P. No.2596 of 2025 was called out resulting in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.2596 of 2025 for non-prosecution. It is next submitted that non-prosecution before this Court on 09.09.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.2596 of 2025 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that Cr.M.P. No.2596 of 2025 be restored to its original file. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 have not raised any serious objection. Considering the facts of the case and the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, Cr.M.P. No.2596 of 2025 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.2596 of 2025 before the concerned Bench after a week. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 10.04.2026-Animesh/