RAM PRAKASH AND 21 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/36543/2026 · 2026-09-13
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36543 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents and Sri Prakhar Saran Srivastava, Advocate for Respondent-2.
2. Petitioners, 22 in numbers, are aggrieved that their names are not included in voter list of Village Panchayat Nagla Taiyyadpur, Post Sakri Jangal, Tehsil and District Budaun.
3. It is informed by learned counsel for Respondent-2 that petitioners have to file independent application in a proper format and if it is submitted alongwith requisite documents before Respondent-4 the same will be considered in accordance with law.
4. In aforesaid circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to file independent application in a proper format with further observation that if any such application is filed within three weeks from today, the same will be considered by concerned respondent in accordance with law. September 14, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar, Bheshaj Puri Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prakhar Saran Srivastava (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ram Prakash And 21 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad