AKHILESH VISHWAKARMA @ RANJEET KUMAR v. STATE OF UP
BAIL/31645/2026 · 2026-09-08
Krishan Pahal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6428 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6428 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31645 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.13 out of 318) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar Patel, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.423 of 2025, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Phoolpur, District- Varanasi, during the pendency of trial.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of two criminal cases shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The details of criminal cases have been mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 02.01.2026. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
5. On the other hand, learned State Law Officer opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Kumar Jaiswal, Sandeep Kumar Patel Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Akhilesh Vishwakarma @ Ranjeet Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
allowed. Let the applicant- Akhilesh Vishwakarma @ Ranjeet Kumar, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.
7. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. September 9, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 31645 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad