APHC010240902015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 394 OF 2015 Between: 1. Pithani Satyanarayana, S/o Vadapalli, 68 Yrs., R/o Hasanabadha village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal East Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Co Ltd, Rep. by its Divisional Engineer, Kakinada, East Godavari District 2. Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Co Ltd, Rep. by its Asst. Executive Engineer (Operations), Ramachandrapuram Rural, Draksharama Section, East Godavari District. 3. Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Co Ltd, Rep. by its Revenue Officer Ramachandrapuram Rural, East Godavari District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in threatening to disconnect the power supply in Service Connection Nos.1442712119-000396 and 203231220000 00046 of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of 2 principles of natural justice consequently directing the respondents not to disconnect the said power supply IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 481 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to disconnect the petitioner's power supply under Service Connection Nos.1442712119-000396 and 20323122000000046 IA NO: 4 OF 2015(WPMP 43970 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WVMP 3763 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the Orders dated 09.06.2015 in W.P.M.P. No.481 of 2015 in W.P.No.394 of 2015 and dismiss the above writ petition with exemplary costs, in the interest o justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: M RAVINDRA (SC FOR APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents:METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 394 OF 2015 ORDER: It is represented by Sri P. Sai Avinash, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, that in view of the subsequent developments, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 24.07.2026 GVK 4 1 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 394 OF 2015 Date: 24.07.2026 GVK