Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6420 (CHH)

NEERAJ SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WA/300/2026 · 2026-04-14

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17103-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 300 of 2026 Neeraj Singh S/o Shri Sitaram Singh Aged About 38 Years R/o D- 269/270 Rama Green City, Phase Ii, Khamtarai Road, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)(Description Of Appellant Is Wrongly Mentioned In Cause Title Of Writ Petition) ... Appellant (s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4 - Prabhakar Tiwari S/o Harnarayan Tiwari Aged About 51 Years R/o Village Kanhaiband, Tehsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 5 - Umesh Kumar Rathore S/o Narrottam Prasad Rathore Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Kanhaiband, Tehsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 6 - Dhansai S/o Sukhram Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Kanhaiband, Tehsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 7 - Chitrabhan Singh Rathore S/o Late Amarnath Rathore Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Kanhaiband, Tehsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.04.16 11:26:51 +0530 2 8 - Vinod Kumar Goyal S/o Laxmiprasad Goyal Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Kanhaiband, Tehsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For appellant : Mr. B. P. Singh along with Mr. Vivek Shrivastava, Advocate For State For Respondent No. 4 to 8 : : Mr. Prasun Bhaduri, Dy. G.A. Mr. H. S. Ahluwalia, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 15/04/2025 1. Heard Mr. B. P. Sharma, Advocate along with Mr. Vivek Shrivastava, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Prasun Bhaduri, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State/ Respondent No. 1 to 3 and Mr. H. S. Ahluwalia, learned counsel for Respondent No. 4 to 8. 2. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant with the following prayer: "It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this writ appeal and set aside the order dated 13.2.2026 passed by Hon'ble Single Judge in WPC No.630/2026, parties being Prabhakar Tiwari & ors vs State of CG & ors, being in violation of principles of natural justice enshrined 3 in maxim audi alteram partem and also in violation of appellant's fundamental, constitutional and statutory rights and in the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that in view of the order passed by learned Single Judge, final order has been passed by the Collector, Dist- Janjgir Champa, on 25.03.2026. learned counsel for the appellant would submit that before passing of that order, the appellant was not heard before the writ Court, though he was a party in the present matter. 4. In such a situation, as the matter has already been disposed of by the Collector, Janjgir-Champa after passing the order of learned Single Judge of this Court, we don’t deem it proper to entertain the present appeal as the order has been executed. 5. In view of the above, the present writ appeal is dismissed. The appellant is at liberty to take recourse to law, if aggrieved of the order of the Collector, Janjgir- Champa. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice sagrika