2 REVW-5-26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 5 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4120 OF 2024 Dinesh Chhotalal Joshi ..Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & anr. …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1151 OF 2026 IN REVIEW PETITION NO. 4 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1154 OF 2026 IN REVIEW PETITION NO. 7 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1153 OF 2026 IN REVIEW PETITION NO. 6 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1155 OF 2026 IN REVIEW PETITION NO. 8 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1152 OF 2026 IN REVIEW PETITION NO. 5 OF 2026 Mr. Prasad Dani, Sr. Advocate, i/b Ms. Disha Jain, for the Review Petitioner/Applicant in RPW/7/2026 a/w IA/1154/2026. Mr. Omkar Kulkarni, i/b Ms. Disha Jain, for Review Petitioner/Applicant in RPW/4/2026, RPW/5/2026, SAINATH, PA 1/3 SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Digitally signed by SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Date: 2026.09.05 14:58:41 +0530 2 REVW-5-26.DOC RPW/6/2026 & RPW/8/2026 a/w IA/1151/2026, IA/1152/2026, IA/1153/2026 & IA/1155/2026. Smt. R S Tendulkar, APP for Respondent – State in RPW/4/2026, 6/2026, 7/2026 & 8/2026. Mr. D J Haldankar, APP for Respondent – State in RPW/5/2026. Mr. Jeetendra Ranawal, for Respondent No. 2 in all. CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 03rd September 2026 P.C.: IA/1154/2026 1. For the reasons assigned in the application and to advance the cause of substantive justice, the delay in preferring the review petition stands condoned. RPW/7/2026 2. Heard Mr. Dani, the learned Senior Advocate, for the review petitioner in RPW/7/2026 alongwith IA/1154/2026. 3. Review is sought on the ground that subsequent to the passing of order by this Court, the review petitioner came in custody of a document i.e. letter dated 06th March, 2026 issued by the Federal Bank to the effect that the review petitioner ceased to be the authorized signatory with effect from 20th October, 2015. SAINATH, PA 2/3 2 REVW-5-26.DOC 4. Even if the said ground is taken at par, that issue touches the merits of the matter and that would not be a ground to review the order passed by this Court. Thus, there is no substance in the review petition. 5. The Review Petition stands dismissed. 6. In view of the dismissal of Review Petition, IA/1154/2026 also stands disposed. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] SAINATH, PA 3/3