[2026:RJ-JP:10150] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 3849/2026 Anil S/o Shri Udayveer, R/o Dhaku, Police Station Raya, District Mathura (U.p.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Dehran For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 10/03/2026 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.442/2025 registered with the Police Station Rajgarh (Alwar), District Alwar for offence under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 318(2), 318(4), 112(2) and 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and no other case pending against him. He also submit that co-accused, Mridul Kumar S/o Krishan Kumar, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 22.01.2026. He further submits that after completion of the investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. It is also submitted that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 28.09.2025 and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he may be [2026:RJ-JP:10150] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3849/2026] enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and submits that the allegations against the accused-petitioner are of serious nature. 4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner, so also the fact that after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and no other case pending against the present accused-petitioner and co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 22.01.2026, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this second bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /7