Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010077982026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/842/2026 MESER UDDIN S/O LATE ASUR UDDIN, R/O VILL MORIAM NAGAR, BALADMARI, PO GOALPARA, PS BALADMARI, DIST GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN 783121 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J ISLAM, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 11.05.2026 Heard Mr. J Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.R Kaushik, learned Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 praying for grant Page No.# 2/3 of pre-arrest ball to the accused applicant, namely, Meser Uddin In connection with Basistha P.S. Case No. 255/2025 (G.R. No. 2370/2025) registered under Section 316 (3) of BNS. 3. The gist of the case is that the accused applicant is the owner of a Truck and his Truck was hired by the informant for transporting goods from Guwahati to Silchar, however, since the Truck did not reach Silchar in time, the informant being suspicious about misappropriation/ stealing of the goods in the Truck has filed the FIR alleging connivance of the accused applicant with the driver of the Truck. 4. The learned counsel for the accused applicant submits that during investigation based on confession of one Jiyarul Islam substantial portion of allegedly stolen and misappropriated goods have already been recovered from one Rakesh Kumar Mahato. He submits that the accused applicant is no way connected in the instant case as he is the owner of the Truck and he was not aware how the goods were misappropriated or stolen. 5. The earlier pre-arrest bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner was rejected vide Order dated 27.10.2025. 6. In the said application, the petitioner was granted interim protection, Page No.# 3/3 pursuant to which he had appeared before the I.O and thereafter, on receipt and perusal of the CD, the same was rejected by the aforesaid order. Today, the CD has been received and on perusal of the said CD, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor submits that the material available therein, revealed that the petitioner is the kingpin of the entire and his involvement is very much clear. Therefore, I do not find any ground to consider the prayer for pre-arrest bail at present. 7. Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arrest bail stands rejected. 8. The petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant