Badri Prasad Rathore v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited
WPS/6363/2017 · 2026-04-14
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6419 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6419 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:17049
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6363 of 2017 1 - Badri Prasad Rathore S/o Late Ram Prasad Rathore, Aged About 76 Years R/o Hardi Bazar, Post Hardi Bazar, Police Station Hardi Bazar Chowki, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Chairman Cum Managing Director, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh 2 - Chief General Manager, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Dipka Area, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer Revenue Katghora, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 5 - Tehsildar, Sub Tehsil, Hardi Bazar, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioner : Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate For State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. A.G. For respondent/SECL : Mr. Sudhir Bajpai, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 15.04.2026
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that land of the petitioner has been acquired but the compensation in lieu of the acquired land has not been granted. In this regard, an application has been preferred by the petitioner vide Annexure-P/2 REKHA SINGH
-2- & P/6 before the respondents which is pending consideration.
2. Be that as it may, respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the application preferred by the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity to the petitioner to file additional/relevant documents, within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authority would be at liberty to decide the said application in accordance with law.
3. With the aforesaid direction/observation, the Writ Petition is finally
disposed of.
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge Rekha